🎯 REMOTE FIRE: CONTROLLED ESCALATION 🚀
Ukraine Launch | U.S. Control Points | Russian Target
According to the Financial Times, the U.S. is preparing to supply Ukraine with Tomahawk cruise missiles — but with a critical condition: American contractors will retain full operational control over targeting and launch. Ukrainian forces will receive U.S.-made launchers, but will not be trained to operate the system independently. Every strike must be authorized and executed by U.S. personnel. The goal: enable Kyiv to hit Russian military, energy, and infrastructure targets deep inside Russia, while allowing Washington to manage escalation risks in real time. Up to 50 missiles could be delivered rapidly, pending final approval at the Trump-Zelenskyy White House meeting.
🔗 Source:
Sources
- RIA Novosti — if Tomahawk are supplied to Kyiv, Americans will control them
- Sputniknews — FT: US contractors will run the missiles in Ukraine
- BFM.ru — FT: US to assist Ukraine in operating Tomahawk
- Meduza — Trump seems close to sending Tomahawk to Ukraine after all
- RBC — FT on how many Tomahawk missiles the US could deliver
- Argumenty i Fakty — FT: US contractors would control any Tomahawk given to Kyiv
- SMOTRIM.ru — FT: Americans will manage the missiles if transferred to Kyiv
🔍 How it fits the Control Stack:
🔹 Layer 1 — Physical:
The battlefield is no longer local — it is transcontinental. A missile launched from Ukrainian soil becomes a U.S. weapon the moment it flies. Physical sovereignty is hollowed out: Ukraine provides the platform, but America holds the trigger. The warzone expands — but only along pre-approved coordinates.
🔹 Layer 2 — Technological:
Tomahawks are not just missiles — they are networked nodes in a global kill chain. GPS, encrypted datalinks, terrain-matching guidance — all require U.S. infrastructure. Without American satellites and fire-control systems, the missile is inert. Technology enforces dependency: the weapon only "wakes up" with U.S. permission.
🔹 Layer 3 — Information:
The narrative: "Supporting Ukraine's self-defense." The subtext: "We are now conducting long-range strikes on Russia — but through a proxy." By controlling the launch, Washington avoids formal attribution while achieving strategic effects. The media reports "Ukrainian strike" — obscuring the fact that the decision, targeting, and authorization came from Langley or the Pentagon.
🔹 Layer 4 — Consciousness:
This normalizes the idea that sovereign states can outsource their offensive capability — and that great powers can wage war without declaring it. Ukrainian commanders internalize: "We aim, but America decides." The public learns: "If it's not officially U.S. — it's not U.S. escalation." The threshold for direct conflict is blurred — not raised.
💡 Conclusion:
This is not an isolated incident.
It is a signal — a test.
And we are the subjects.
No comments:
Post a Comment